Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €39.87 vs €141.58
- Up to 68% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - €0.08 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4440 - 562 vs 512 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
512
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7846 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
32%
Price, €
€141.58
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7846 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |