Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 3378 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-430M - 163 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-430M - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-430M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-430M doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-430M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
