Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i5-4250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2224 days newer than Core i5-4250U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-4250U - 258 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €88.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Single-Core
772
68.43971631205675%
Multi-Core
1467
40.536059684995855%
Intel Core i5-4250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |