Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-4200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2522 days newer than Core i5-4200U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4200U - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4200U - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4200U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |