Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i5-3570K - 63 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - €127.8 vs €186.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-3570K - €2.03 vs €3.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €186.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4365 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €127.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |