Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1460 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €78.98 vs €182.66
- Up to 52% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - €0.51 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3570 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
156
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5271 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
47%
Price, €
€182.66
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |