Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €34.99 vs €544.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900 - €0.31 vs €3.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 41% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3550 - 158 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |