Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €34.99 vs €203.97
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-14100F - €0.14 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3550 - 288 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
257
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
19%
Price, €
€203.97
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €203.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |