Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-3470T - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 24 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
57.6530612244898%
Multi-Core
1135
17.386642156862745%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
