Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3210 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3470T - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-3470T - €80.5 vs €246.72
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €246.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 412 minutes ago
Buy for €80.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
38.85832187070151%
Multi-Core
1135
25.380143112701255%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |