Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3427U outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3427U is 144 days older than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-3427U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
