Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2339 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-3340M - 185 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |