Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1738 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3340M - 121 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €148.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
523
38.654841093865485%
Multi-Core
1054
22.198820556023588%
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |