Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €37.44 vs €289.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-14400F - €0.15 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 100% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3330 - 497 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
249
50%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
Buy for €289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |