Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1896 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3320M - 529 vs 451 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |