Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 112% better in War Thunder than Core i5-2500K - 294 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - €659.99 vs €738.82
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
139
47.27891156462585%
Value, €/FPS
€5.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€738.82
89%
Value Winner
Buy for €738.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32897 minutes ago
Buy for €659.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
21.39072847682119%
Multi-Core
1921
10.514504652435686%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |