Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2500K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2500K is 2186 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930 - 156 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €29.99 vs €88.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930 - €0.19 vs €0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€29.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 511 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |