Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Core i5-2415M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 1103 days newer than Core i5-2415M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2415M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2415M - 500 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2415M - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2415M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |