Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1989 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-2400S - 109 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
99
90.82568807339449%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
42.2847399829497%
Multi-Core
1352
20.10110020814749%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |