Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1260 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10850K - 208 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €289.0 vs €349.59
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74473 minutes ago
Buy for €349.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Single-Core
1740
74.04255319148936%
Multi-Core
9096
80.07747160841623%
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |