Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240 - 150 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €23.0 vs €289.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75236 minutes ago
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
23.574468085106385%
Multi-Core
1137
10.009683951052029%
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |