Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-8100 - 243 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €214.78 vs €267.95
- Up to 9% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-13600KF - €1.0 vs €1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
90.9090909090909%
Price, €
€267.95
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €267.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37656 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
214
88.06584362139918%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€214.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €214.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
45.32216963960685%
Multi-Core
3405
22.08887447291599%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |