Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1487 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-9100 - 185 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €59.99 vs €299.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-13600K - €0.37 vs €1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
22%
Price, €
€299.98
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
161
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |