Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F and the cheaper Core i5-13400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €237.99 vs €584.48
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - €0.52 vs €1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400 - 480 vs 458 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €237.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
42%
Price, €
€584.48
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €584.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |