Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - 182 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - €69.02 vs €189.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12600KF - €0.42 vs €1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
40%
Price, €
€189.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15337 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |