Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 426 days older than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-13100F - 189 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - €109.75 vs €221.37
- Up to 50% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-12600K - €0.59 vs €1.17 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
50%
Price, €
€221.37
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
185
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |