Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 39% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4100 - 212 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €22.88 vs €204.79
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €204.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 355 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |