Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3504 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3570 - 121 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €78.98 vs €142.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400F - €0.84 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
71%
Price, €
€142.88
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €142.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12335 minutes ago
Buy for €78.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |