Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - 176 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €69.02 vs €155.05
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12400 - €0.42 vs €0.88 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15423 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |