Key Differences
In short — Core i5-1235U outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-1235U is 2774 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1235U
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160T - 140 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-1235U
Mobile • Feb 23rd, 2022
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
50.48543689320388%
Multi-Core
1796
31.387626703949667%
Intel Core i5-1235U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Feb 23rd, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Iris Xe 80EU | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
