Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600T is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600T
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 109 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
60.325732899022796%
Multi-Core
3996
66.92346340646458%
Intel Core i5-11600T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
