Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-4670K - 265 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €109.7 vs €186.17
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600KF - €0.47 vs €0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
67%
Price, €
€186.17
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
234
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |