Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - 130 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €181.13 vs €208.88
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600K - €1.6 vs €1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
99%
Price, €
€208.88
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
113
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €181.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |