Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3677 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 86% better in F1 23 than Core i3-2100 - 276 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-2100 - €0.66 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €113.23 vs €182.66
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51405 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
148
53.62318840579711%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
85.71428571428572%
Price, €
€113.23
100%
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
21.31747483989021%
Multi-Core
954
11.120177176827136%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |