Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €190.43 vs €364.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-12900F - €0.94 vs €1.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-11500 - 220 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 24 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
91.81818181818183%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €190.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
56.62650602409639%
Price, €
€364.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €364.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1996
78.61362741236707%
Multi-Core
7424
53.44852411807055%
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |