Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €104.0 vs €643.16
- Up to 82% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900K - €0.56 vs €3.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Deathloop than Core i5-11400F - 206 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
17%
Price, €
€643.16
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €643.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |