Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-2400S - 369 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €69.9 vs €117.5
- Up to 31% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-11400F - €0.22 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
369
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
68%
Price, €
€117.5
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6529 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
319
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6528 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |