Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3677 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-2120 - 122 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €61.99 vs €107.29
- Up to 28% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-11400F - €0.63 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
71%
Price, €
€107.29
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €107.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
99
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |