Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1840 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €19.0 vs €117.5
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11400F - €0.17 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
18%
Price, €
€117.5
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2539 minutes ago
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |