Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €129.99 vs €579.04
- Up to 75% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - €1.11 vs €4.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11400 - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17951 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.39/FPS
25%
Price, €
€579.04
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €579.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |