Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2844 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4570 - 141 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-4570 - €158.3 vs €172.66
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4570 - €1.12 vs €1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4570 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
126
89.36170212765957%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
81.75182481751825%
Price, €
€172.66
91%
Buy for €172.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |