Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1764 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-6400 - 403 vs 324 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €118.03 vs €258.88
- Up to 64% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-6400 - €0.29 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
403
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €118.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |