Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3470 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €37.99 vs €124.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10600KF - €0.25 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
155
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |