Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - 132 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €141.1 vs €203.76
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €141.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73999 minutes ago
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
49.44055944055944%
Multi-Core
2469
44.98087083257424%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |