Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4670 - 561 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €110.81 vs €140.4
- Up to 16% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400 - €0.21 vs €0.25 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €140.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16130 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
529
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |