Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 438 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-10300H - 230 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
