Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 1311 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100T - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €65.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
81.06469002695418%
Multi-Core
3178
67.58826031475968%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |