Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €128.88 vs €550.43
- Up to 65% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.59 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 50% better in F1 23 than Core i3-9100F - 327 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
218
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
327
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
35%
Price, €
€550.43
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €550.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |