Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1255 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 62 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
