Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8121U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8121U is 1335 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8121U
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 182 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8121U - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 5th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8121U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cannon Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |